> If .indexes turns out to be used a lot, then let's have .i -- "i" for
> "index" is accepted abbreviation, isn't it? (Think for (i = 0; ...;
> ...))
+1 here. I too find ^$n a bit bizarre, but I like the look of

for @foo.i

OTOH, I like the parallels between %foo.keys and @foo.keys -- it recalls
the idea that an array can be thought of as a hash where the keys are
constrained to be sequential (or not, if it is sparse) integers.

Stop the infinite loop, I want to get off!     http://surreal.istic.org/
Paraphernalia/Never hides your broken bones,/ And I don't know why you'd
want to try:/ It's plain to see you're on your own.        -- Paul Simon
  The documentation that can be written is not the true documentation.

Reply via email to