TSa wrote: > Note that a prominent, typical foo actually reads: > > self .bar; > > And a self($_.bar) is pretty much useless. In other words > wrongly huffmanized.
FWIW, I agree with both points. Some more points: * I think both "say(.meth)" or ".meth.say" are more succinct/readable than "say .meth" for "say($_.meth)". * "say() .meth" is a parsefail according to the new rules, but can be quite useful to align things up. I committed r8573 only because of r8563 changed the dot/whitespace interaction, which caused inconsistencies in other parts of the example... The old interaction rules imho is quite easier to explain. Audrey
Description: OpenPGP digital signature