Thanks to all who have read or replied -
I'm reading the Concurrency POD right now - more questions when I'm done. ________________________________ John Drago | VP Software Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.precissystems.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:43 AM > To: perl6-language@perl.org > Subject: Re: Synchronized / Thread syntax in Perl 6 > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:41:06PM -0600, John Drago wrote: > > class Foo is synchronized { > > ... > > } > > > > our method Bar is synchronized { > > ... > > } > > > > class Baz { > > has $.Bux is synchronized; > > } > > To everyone participating in this thread: > There has already been a draft spec for concurrency written, please see > http://svn.perl.org/perl6/pugs/trunk/docs/Perl6/Spec/Concurrency.pod . > > It suggests "is critical;" for the first, and second, but I can't see > anything like the third. It also suggests that Perl6 will have > transactions and so will also have "is atomic". > > (There's a Google Summer of Code project to add software transactional > memory primitives to parrot.) > > -- > Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >