On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:27, David Green wrote:

> However, what I'm wondering is whether Order::Same is "but true" and
> the others "but false"?  (Which makes cmp in boolean context the same
> as eqv, but it seems to make sense that way.)

OTOH, C programmers can as well assume 'cmp' being an equivalent of '! eqv' in 
boolean context; after all that's how strcmp() works... The same goes for 
assembly programmers.

(* goes back lurking *)

Alexey A. Kiritchun

Reply via email to