Sex, 2008-11-14 às 09:14 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu:
> That's correct.  We could fix it two ways.  Either the mainline code
> gets a consistent new name, or the outermost scope is redefined to an INIT
> if there is a user-defined MAIN.  I can argue it both ways.

I'd argue that there's an implicit INIT block around all the mainline


Reply via email to