Jon Lang wrote: >> @@ -1836,6 +1836,12 @@ >> prototype objects, in which case stringification is not likely to >> produce something of interest to non-gurus.) >> >> +The C<.^parents> method by default returns a flattened list of all >> +parents sorted in MRO (dispatch) order. Other options are: >> + >> + :local just returns the immediate parents >> + :hierarchical the inheritance heirarchy as nested arrays > > Bad Huffman coding, IMHO. Could we s/hierarchical/tree/?
Huffman coding? How often do you you call meta object methods? Anyway, I agree that :tree would be nicer (notice that "hierarchical" is sufficiently hard to type so it's typed wrongly in 50% of the occurrences ;-)) Moritz
