On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Aaron Sherman <a...@ajs.com> wrote: > I do think, though that if the concern is really with "the 4 cases when > nqp hauls a CALL-ME out of its bowels" then that's what should be > addressed... >
The main addressing of that is some kind of role to abstract it properly. I just think the current situation is bad and even if we come up with a name for the new role, it's still going to be confusing ("ok, why do we have both Callable and Invokable? ...uh wait, Callable means *what* exactly?"). -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net