At 07:37 PM 9/24/00 -0400, Ben Tilly wrote:
>We have mere days to get any final RFCs in.
>Is there any significant objection to my proposing two?
>1) Perl should switch to something like an MIT license
>   together with a trademark on Perl (likely with O'Reilly
>   requested to care of the details).
>2) Continue dual-licensing GPL/AL with the AL being as I
>   rewrote it, with 1.3 and 1.4 changed to match the GPL
>   wording in section 0, and whatever changes Bradley Kuhn
>   comes up with included.

Gimme a day or two to come up with a clause that covers my issues with 2.8 
and I'm cool with both. (I'm fine with #1 regardless)


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to