[Grabbing an old thread...]

Ben Tilly wrote:

>   My understanding is that the intent of the AL is to keep there from
> being a proprietary derivative named perl with restricted source.  (If it
> is not named perl then that is explicitly allowed.)

I believe my draft of the Artistic License does the best it can to reach
this goal.

I have seen few comments on it, though.

Ben, how do you feel about it?


Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

PGP signature

Reply via email to