Chris Nandor writes: > Seeing as how the RFC process is done, I don't think there is a conclusion > to be had in this forum, at this point. And I have trouble seeing how watching you and Brad go back and forth is going to do anything other than raise my blood pressure :-) Perhaps it's time for off-list email. Nat
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Please stay on topic (was Re: lice... Bradley M. Kuhn
- non-licensing issues ? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: l... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (w... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Russ Allbery
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens