David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >However, maybe you can find out something for us. Specifically, why isn't >Perl 5.6 a part of "official" Debian in this latest release, and 5.005_03 >still is? Have you considered that it might be a purely technical issue? 5.6.0 has serious snags with OO packages not designed to work round its oddities. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Why modifing the Artistic license is a good... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Why modifing the Artistic license i... Chris Nandor
- Re: Why modifing the Artistic lice... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Kai Henningsen
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Please stay on topic (was Re: licensing... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licens... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was R... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (w... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (w... Russ Allbery
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Bradley M. Kuhn