On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Well, until Larry releases the spec, just about everything else is frozen, 
> though we can certainly expand the PDD stuff to include the standard 
> library, documentation, and QA stuff. (It seems a tad premature to be 
> proposing language changes when we neither have a final language spec nor 
> an implementation of that spec...) PDDs don't have to be all internal--I 
> changed the name to deal with the confusion with the IETF's RFCs. (We were 
> fast creeping up on the active RFC range)

Understood.  One other quick question.  Are the PDDs expect to go terminal at
the delivery of Perl 6, or should the active PDDs continue to evolve and govern
Perl 6 maintenance as well?  (If that makes any sense.)

Bryan C. Warnock
RABA Technologies

Reply via email to