"Bryan C. Warnock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, there's also Meta stuff for discussion that we should probably 
> document as well.  As much as I disliked RFC, I also disliked PDD, as it 
> 'sounds' internal.  But do we create a new category for every new area we 
> attempt to document, or do we change the name to reflect something more 
> generic?  (The PDD has a Class field to distinguish between internals, 
> meta, and language already.)
> If we go with mulitple documents, is the numbering scheme concurrent?

Sounds good to me.

Also, if we go down the 'have a competition to see who can write the best
PDD on subject X' path, can we replace the 'TBD' in unnumbered PDDs
with a short string chosen by the author? This allows us to (hopefully)
unqiuely refer to a document during disussions, but when a final winner
is chosen and given a number, the offical library can still pretend the
losers never existed, unless people look in the 'losers' section.
rather than


for my attempt at garbage collection or whatever.

Reply via email to