On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:20:13AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
> So, I wonder aloud, do we want to signify that degree of change with a more 
> dramatic change in the name?  Still Perl, but maybe Perl 7, Perl 10, Perl 
> 2001, Perl NG, Perl* - heck, I don't know, I'm just trying to get the 
> creative juices flowing. 

As a data point, Python are currently in the middle of a Perl 6 style
redesign, and are calling the result Python 3000. Maybe if we called it
Perl 3000, we might be able to get a beta out by then.

We *have* dirty minds. This is not news.
    - Kake Pugh

Reply via email to