On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:06:59PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Maybe, but for one I'm starting to wonder. TomC's rant rang true in > my ears. How much can we change and still call it the same language? > I'm not yet panicking, I'm just trying to hug some firm ground here. The Apocalypses are supposed to be deltas (or at least, alpha deltas) between Camel 3 and what is, I suppose, Camel 4. In terms of the things discussed in chapters 1 and 2 of Camel 3, and the size of the Apocalypses, I don't think there's really *that* much cause to panic. -- IBM: It may be slow, but it's hard to use.
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Damian Conway
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Stephen P. Potter
- perlsmall (was Re: Perl, the new generation) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff