On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:08:40PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:55:55PM -0400, Stephen P. Potter wrote: > > Atoms- Unicode. If everything is Unicode, you're going to have to grok > > Unicode (at least tangentally) to be able to use perl. > > Bah. Rubbish, no more than you need to grok Unicode to use Perl 5.6. > Do you know what data of yours 5.6 is storing in Unicode? No. > Do you care? No. Do you need to? No. One of the big selling points about Java is that it's always use Unicode natively from day 1, yet I've never seen a "Unicode Primer for programmers starting out with Java" book/site/article/paper/certification. Unicode is just *there*. Much like oxygen and nitrogen. The tangential deviation necessary to grok unicode to use Perl is perhaps .01 degrees away from the previous learning curve. Using Perl to grok Unicode is a little different. :-) Z.
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nick Stankus
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern