On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Moritz Lenz <mor...@faui2k3.org> wrote:
>> the indirect method call syntax is the right approach, you just got too
>> many other details wrong to make it work.

This syntax works in a method as you said:


Again I was getting errors that masked the correctness of that
syntax--incomplete debugging!

Thanks all.



> Fair enough--my fingers fumbled a few important things.  I'll correct
> and recheck;
> Thanks, Moritz (and Bruce).
> Cheers!
> -Tom

Reply via email to