Thanks, I missed making the named arguments required in my initial example.
What I thought was a "less than awesome" error was perfectly appropriate;
with the named arguments being optional, no arguments meant the first MAIN
ran and tried printing its uninitialized parameter.

-y

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Perhaps you want that the named arguments are required rather than
> ...
>
> Thanks, Pm!
>
> Best,
>
> -Tom
>

Reply via email to