Re: Proposed docs for C

[Parrot Raiser]

On 9/16/15, David H. Adler <d...@pobox.com> wrote:

> So, how about this
>
> perl6 -e 'sub a {state @x; @x.push(++$)}; say a for 1..6;'
>
> [1]
> [1 2]
> &c

Even better, but how about 'for a..f'? That makes it clear that the
list values are being used, not some sort of subscript. (The less
ambiguity possible in an example, the better.)