> On 23 May 2017, at 19:23, ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com> wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 06:30 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
>> Removed? It's still available athttps://github.com/tadzik/panda  …
> It is on its way out.  The developers over on the chat
> line directed me to zef when I asked for help getting
> panda working.
>>> Panda stinks.
>> That's not really true or called for.
> Panda is broken and not going to be repaired.  The
> developers on the chat line recommend zef instead.
> Was polite enough?

Perhaps you should check out the section “The End of an Era” in last weeks Perl 
6 Weekly: https://p6weekly.wordpress.com/2017/05/16/2017-20-crossing-the-alps/

You should realize that open source software is not made by robots but by 
people.  People for which keeping up with changes can take more resources than 
they have at hand.

Also remember that without panda, I don’t think we would have had an ecosystem 
out now as fleshed out as it is now.

So saying that certain software stinks, feels more like projection than 
anything else.  So yes, *I* think it was uncalled for.


Reply via email to