There was a brief period where the 2D array support in rcols had different behavior for a single column specification versus the new 2D array ref specification.
That has been corrected so that dim(0) is *always* the data down the column and thus, the 2D piddles have dim(1) running *across* the columns selected. As far as I know, the documentation is correct as written for PDL-2.4.11. --Chris On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Louis Chaillet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, just a quick question. > > I noticed that the order of the dimensions of a piddle that I read from file > with rcols seem to have changed from Perl release 5.10.1 to 5.14.2. > > It may have changed in between, but those are the versions I have. In the > earlier version the first dimension was over the rows of the file. In the > second it is over the columns of the file. > > Is this correct, or am I missing something? If it is correct what was the > first version with the first dimension over the columns of the file? > > Kind regards, Louis > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
