Chris, see my example that reproduces the old behavior with the latest git - dim(0) running across column within a row and dim(1) running across row within a column.
Cheers, Craig On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: > There was a brief period where the 2D array > support in rcols had different behavior for a > single column specification versus the new > 2D array ref specification. > > That has been corrected so that dim(0) is > *always* the data down the column and > thus, the 2D piddles have dim(1) running > *across* the columns selected. > > As far as I know, the documentation is correct > as written for PDL-2.4.11. > > --Chris > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Louis Chaillet > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, just a quick question. >> >> I noticed that the order of the dimensions of a piddle that I read from file >> with rcols seem to have changed from Perl release 5.10.1 to 5.14.2. >> >> It may have changed in between, but those are the versions I have. In the >> earlier version the first dimension was over the rows of the file. In the >> second it is over the columns of the file. >> >> Is this correct, or am I missing something? If it is correct what was the >> first version with the first dimension over the columns of the file? >> >> Kind regards, Louis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perldl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl >> > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
