On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Ralf Skyper Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I understand the goal of making life harder for state surveillance. > However, I am not willing (personally) to incur any degraded user experience, > premature cell phone battery depletion, etc in order to support this goal. > I suspect, but cannot prove, that most users would express similar feelings. the browser/CA transition from 1024 to 2048 bit certs is ongoing albiet done soon. That's a cost that everyone is paying for whether they know it or not… We therefore have an internet scale existence proof. > > > I remember the same argument from the last decade when the Internet > transitioned from TELNET to SSH. Some people said SSH would cause to much > internet traffic and the servers could not handle the extra crypto. > > Imagine today's internet with every admin still using TELNET. > > Where are these admins now? Speak up please. > > regards, > > Ralf > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
