-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hiya,

On 10/16/2013 08:47 PM, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> 
> We need universal protection against active adversaries, because
> the precedents have been set and the distinction between passive
> and active really is the willingness of the adversary to include
> active techniques.  We need end-to-end data integrity on all
> communication and if you have end-to-end integrity, anything
> point-to-point rather than broadcast should also include
> confidentiality since you can just about get it for free by this
> point.

While I sympathise with more protection and with moves towards
more-than-MTI, and I fully agree with you about LAN traffic, I
think also requiring e2e mutual auth (which I think is implied
in the above) would be counterproductive.

The problem is that that introduces a management problem into
every scenario and that management overhead is I think is (today)
the main reason why the most of the MTI security features we
define don't get traction until the exploits experienced by
users/networks become intolerable.

I think the path forward is more like making opportunistic
security mechanisms (in particular confidentiality) more-than-MTI
in a way that builds in some security (against passive attacks)
as an inherent feature of new protocols, but also results in
a far easier transition from there to fully authenticated,
compared to the massive gap between cleartext and fully
authenticated.

S.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXvXMAAoJEC88hzaAX42iRasIAKCb5fYaOPKttao3+KYEXnrb
cxZ4+/uw9YSc7VDnuWrd3HgD/+2czeZGJB5mqKUCcFsNfX1yjdwD471l7ugIeAlO
BNH61PbB5UVrxMxXBV4E016lFSgf0A/TFYMb6C0afBE7mGBI5z+2mro4fTPfUwji
NMQ98SUfMzYG7rBie4gyFBnKU5WiFnqLihy+QkFbHwc9aJMfFZWImnf5baWouoNN
jMshAZyaPiyYuT/Vsgj5E2mGmWkqKLkQ+q8qdrbg+AJC52qjd7+p96A/LTq46IQk
2SPocGdQYZaohHHPYWzzHcGNGIfznG9Ibn0nbyelXP3U6k5LAz74vnT8DsmZG4Y=
=/l+A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to