> "IP VPN" includes not only MPLS VPN
the vpn without a p _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Albert Lunde
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Mark Atwood
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? joel jaeggli
- [perpass] When private is equated with secure (was: manda... SM
- Re: [perpass] When private is equated with secure (was: m... Scott Brim
- Re: [perpass] When private is equated with secure (was: m... Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] When private is equated with secure Dave Crocker
- Re: [perpass] When private is equated with secure (was: m... joel jaeggli
- Re: [perpass] When private is equated with secure (was: m... Yoav Nir
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Kent
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Brian Trammell
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? SM
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Ross Schulman
- Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? Stephen Kent
