Hi Dave, Good point. Hence the word "generally." I obviously don't fit that definition either...nor frankly do most others, as the discussion has largely been focussed on technical matters. The definition was intended to apply to those on the list who seem to get pleasure from the government if not private sector surveillance bashing and are motivated by it. So apologies for the over reaching comedic definition.
The metrics are, however, themselves interesting, and indicative of who shapes the discussions, who are especially motivated. and the surprisingly large number of people participating. With 131 people posting, the views are diverse, and among those participating above the norm, the platforms are interesting albeit mostly well tread and unlikely to be pursued except in small communities of users that have the motivation and money to pursue them. best, --tony On 10/29/2013 10:34 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
I thought the purpose of this list was technical discussion, not discussion of government agencies, per se.
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
