On 10/29/2013 8:13 AM, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
Hi Dave,
Good point. Hence the word "generally." I obviously
Tony,
The word you used was 'usually'. Either way it's wrong. Your asserting
paranoia as the basis for the comments is entirely inappropriate here,
both for scope and justification.
And the topic of the NSA has not dominated the list, which makes
'generally' or 'usually' statistically wrong, also.
As for 'shaping' the discussion, your simplistic model implies that a
single, cogent posting doesn't affect the shape as much as raw number of
postings, or that we haven't had such postings. It doesn't take a human
communications masters degree to know that that's wrong, too. While
knowing posting rate can be informative, it's not nearly as substantive
as you've just asserted.
So as comedic attempts go, you should try to develop better material,
but my personal request is that you please not here. Invoking NSA here
is mostly likely (or will 'usually') create distractions.
Surely that's not your intent?[*]
d/
[*] That's what is called a rhetorical question.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
