On 12 November 2013 14:55, Nick Mathewson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Stephen Farrell > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hiya, >> >> Way back in the mists of September there was a thread [1] >> on this that seemed to have broad agreement that this was >> a useful and quite doable change to TLS but I don't think >> we currently have a clear owner to push it along in the >> TLS WG. If everyone thinks someone else will get around to >> doing this, it won't happen. >> >> Any takers? > > I'd be glad to lend my enthusiasm, time, and modest sticktoitiveness, > but I'd need somebody with more experience working in WGs to help me > with the process stuff.
I can help with process stuff. > (An update on the topic: OpenSSL has merged my patches to randomize > gmt_unix_time by default. I also wrote a patch to allow tlsdate, the > one known user of gmt_unix_time that people mentioned, to support > reading the time from HTTPS headers. That patch has also been merged.) > > yrs, > -- > Nick Mathewson > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
