On 11/12/2013 02:15 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Stephen Farrell: >> Way back in the mists of September there was a thread [1] >> on this that seemed to have broad agreement that this was >> a useful and quite doable change to TLS but I don't think >> we currently have a clear owner to push it along in the >> TLS WG. If everyone thinks someone else will get around to >> doing this, it won't happen. >> >> Any takers? > > Does the IETF have an issue tracking system for such issues (besides > mailing lists) ?
Individual working groups manage that themselves so YMMV. For this activity I've been keeping track via a file:-) That's at [1] but I'm in the process of updating it based on all last week's events so the current version is out of date. I'll have it updated in the next few days with what I think is the current state of play when I'm done going over the meeting notes etc. Meanwhile, feel free to volunteer to take this one on if you're up for pushing the work along in the TLS WG. Cheers. S. [1] http://down.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/misc/perpass.txt > > Cheers, > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
