On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:32:06PM +0000, Dan York <[email protected]> wrote a message of 117 lines which said:
> I very much support the draft By the way, the draft talks only about *passive* attacks, in line with the perpass "charter", and therefore does not mention DNSSEC. But evil projects like QUANTUM and FOXACID <https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/10/how_the_nsa_att.html> are known to use *active* attacks to make mass surveillance easier. Against these attacks, DNSSEC may have a role. Good summary (and plead for DNSSEC deployment) in <http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/11/this-is-how-the-internet-backbone-has-been-turned-into-a-weapon/> _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
