In the shameless self-promotion department, this IS my day job. See http://s2erc.georgetown.edu/projects/cyberISE/ for the theoretical work and http://gcsc.georgetown.edu/ if one needs an operational venue.
On Nov 28, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > Randy is quite right. > > has to happen occasionally > > > The attacks reported in the news article were against the private > > optical fibers linking the geographically distributed data centers of > > large companies like Google or Yahoo. A discussion about that should > > start with the folks in charge of securing these data centers at > > Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft, et cetera. I can see some > > difficulties, because a fair bit of the data centers architectures is > > probably treated as trade secret. And I am really not sure that the > > IETF is the best place to conduct such discussions. > > we had/have the same oroblem with datacenter* wgs. the folk who really > do it think of it as secret sauce. so it becomes the vendors trying to > sell solutions to problems they don't understand. hell, i don't even > know iij datacentr technology to any depth. > > Just to be clear, when I said they are more willing to share than you said > earlier, I was referring to a closed door sharing in some members only forum. > That model definitely works. > > The IETF might play a role in brokering the setting up of such an > organization but any sharing is not going to take place in public and not in > the IETF and it is going to take place at a certain degree of abstraction. > > > > -- > Website: http://hallambaker.com/ > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
