On 9 December 2013 15:03, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > In point of fact, most of the interesting IoT vulnerabilities we've seen so > far have not been due to either of the above problems, but rather to > manufacturers making stupid decisions that couldn't have been fixed by any > number of RFCs.
Do you mean to say that RFCs are not the place to address this introduction problem, or that people ignore RFCs? The latter is something we already deal with; the former seems doable, were there the will to do so. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
