On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > Ben > > > How about this footnote? >> >> "A cryptographically verifiable log is an append-only log of hashes of >> more-or-less anything that can prove its own correctness >> cryptographically. See RFC 6962, >> >> I'd like something a bit more technical, since the phrase "prove its > own correctness" is pretty general. Hopefully there is text in 6962 > that you can use. >
How about just call it a catenate certificate append-only notary log which is the technical term of are that Harber and Stornetta introduced in their paper and patents? -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
