On 31/12/13 06:25, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > PGP has not met the original goal of becoming ubiquitous so replacing PGP > seems to me to be a very worthwhile goal. Replacing STARTTLS with something > that has message scope but is not end to end does not seem like a good > proposition. >
Maybe a little OT on this thread, but for those who missed it (OpenPGPv4) Key IDs seem to have problems (at least when those pesky humans get involved) http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/current/msg07195.html http://debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/105 +1 for replacing PGP. Pete. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
