On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Watson Ladd <[email protected]> wrote:
> So what does this draft change in that regard? I'm not really seeing > the gains to privacy that > were promised, except maybe against other evesdroppers on the same > segment who aren't using > active attacks. > That. It is certainly one of the goals of the perpass effort. If one can do better (such as detect MITMs so you don't have to communicate through one if you don't want), that's great too.
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
