On Mar 21, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Robert Story <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless the client does the decryption locally... If gmail offered this > option, I'm sure browser plugin writers would meet the challenge quickly..
That is no longer webmail. It would have serious usability problems. And to further put the obvious, even that provides no protection for incoming messages. -- Nicholas Weaver it is a tale, told by an idiot, [email protected] full of sound and fury, 510-666-2903 .signifying nothing PGP: http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/data/nweaver_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
