On 3/23/14 6:49 PM, Jiankang Yao wrote: > it is a good start. thanks. > since there are thousands of RFCs, it is better that they can be > reviewd by category. > for example, based on the following category: > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/np.html
I'm not sure about that - there are a lot of documents defining protocols that have never been implemented or deployed, and so on. It seems likely to me that as this process is starting up, people will tend to review significant documents, which is what probably the best place to start anyway. As more documents are reviewed there may be a need to become more systematic. But for now, I think the current situation is good. Melinda _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
