(bcc'ing perpass and moving this to ietf-privacy which we agreed was a better list for this)
On 03/24/2014 03:46 AM, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 3/23/14 6:49 PM, Jiankang Yao wrote: >> it is a good start. thanks. >> since there are thousands of RFCs, it is better that they can be >> reviewd by category. >> for example, based on the following category: >> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/np.html > > I'm not sure about that - there are a lot of documents > defining protocols that have never been implemented or > deployed, and so on. It seems likely to me that as this > process is starting up, people will tend to review > significant documents, which is what probably the best > place to start anyway. As more documents are reviewed > there may be a need to become more systematic. But > for now, I think the current situation is good. I agree with Melinda. Let's get a body of work done that people want to do or feel is important to do and then we can organise that. So jump in and review something. S. > > Melinda > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
