On 11/02/16 15:02, Russ Housley wrote: > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/09/internet-of-things-smart-home-devices-government-surveillance-james-clapper?CMP=share_btn_fb > > Yeah, that's a shocker eh;-(
FYI, I did try to argue for defining a padding scheme in the COSE wg [1] but nobody else seems to care, so at present, I think they won't define a mechanism. Padding of course isn't anywhere near sufficient but if we don't add such mechanisms to our protocols, then ISTM that we're making that kind of tracking easier. More broadly, if someone has expertise in this space, and would like to do a presentation at a saag session at an IETF meeting, I think that'd be good. Contact Kathleen and I if so. S. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/eq6HMc8tm1sYghpS8LFcvADZPn8 > > > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
