To be fair, there is really no way at present for IoT vendors to deliver service without running the data collection end, unless they sell you a workstation to do it at home. If there were a place at home where data collection apps could run, it's not inconceivable that something better could be arranged, but at present there is no basis for vendors of data collection equipment to cooperate with vendors of data aggregation services. In order for that to change, someone has to lead the way. It's possible that if someone leads the way, it still won't happen, but without that, it definitely won't happen.
The IETF has the technological basis for working on this problem, but it would be completely speculative at this point, and probably we'd get it wrong. More likely this is something that the open source community should work on, if we want it to be open. I think the IETF could play a role in that process, because otherwise we'll get a repeat of the dbus fiasco, but we can't really drive the effort--all we can do is try to document it and address interop problems before they are cast in concrete. Customer satisfaction with various laptop<->cloud solutions is quite low at the moment, BTW. I am not convinced that this model of operation is actually the wave of the future. Maybe they will figure out how to do it right, but at the moment the jury is out. A more open development model probably would have made this better, but wouldn't have served the interests of the incumbents. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2/11/2016 10:39 AM, Christian Huitema wrote: >> >> any of the appliances are designed to "report to the cloud," and have >> a business model based on the "big data" that they acquire. If we >> design appliances like that, it will be hard to keep "big brother" >> away. > > ... >> >> Sure, encrypting the communications between the appliances and the >> cloud cannot hurt. But we should also look at standardization, so >> that appliances can communicate directly, or so that people could >> easily switch the "appliance monitoring" services. In the absence of >> such standards, we get lots of info concentrated in few places, which >> becomes of course a target for all kind of spying. > > > > Yes, but... > > First, tablets and, now, PCs are following exactly the same reporting model. > > Second, the 'monitoring' is controlled by the original vendor and they have > no interest in handing that control over to anyone else, no is there any > groundswell among customers to force the change. > > Standards work when there is a very strong market force demanding them. We > ain't got that. Yet(?) > > d/ > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
