> If someone insists of having the "Reh" shape, he should use the U+066x
> code, while changing the glyph shape in the font.

Yes, that makes sense. I forgot that the discussion was about the glyph itself
and not the encoding.

-Fariborz

_______________________________________________
PersianComputing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing

Reply via email to