> If someone insists of having the "Reh" shape, he should use the U+066x > code, while changing the glyph shape in the font.
Yes, that makes sense. I forgot that the discussion was about the glyph itself and not the encoding. -Fariborz _______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing