On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Saied Nesbat wrote:
> This sounds like overkill, a roundabout way of doing that has
> to be done a lot simpler. Am I missing something? Since the
> Unicode characters have the information, should Word not at
> least act as a simple box?
Implementing the whole Unicode in Microsoft way means a lot of
code which results in a lot of binaries, so they simply can't
install them all 'just in case'. You need to explicitly ask it
to install Arabic script support...
> Best regards,
PersianComputing mailing list