On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:27:30PM -0600, Sean Gabriel Heacock wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 23:24 +0300, Janno Sannik wrote: > > ok, but what about adding a similar implementation as mpm-itk uses: > > simulate timeout and close connection so browser would reconnect. It is > > said to work well in practice and to be compliant with RFC2616 > > Isn't that basically the same thing as turning KeepAlive off though? >
I'm guessing they do it only on a request that the vhost can't handle. That sounds like it should work pretty well. > I hadn't heard of ITK before. Looks like they're doing pretty much the > same thing we are. > I didn't either. > -- > Sean Gabriel Heacock > Telana Internet Services > http://www.telana.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Peruser mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser _______________________________________________ Peruser mailing list [email protected] http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
