Bill and Tom,
Thanks for this interesting and informative exchange. Although my
experience supports Tom's point of view, I very much appreciate Bill
presenting his experiences and opinions and continuing to engage in the
conversation. This is just the type of discussion that makes the dislist
format so valuable in spreading information and addressing problems.
Rick

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kerschner
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [pestlist] bugs


I have to agree with Tom on the importance and effectiveness of using
pest specific pheromone baited traps to identify and control insect
infestations. Buy using the traps as monitors, we discovered a case
making moth infestation in our 5000 sq ft large artifact storage
building in the spring of 2007. By increasing the number of traps from 3
to 10 to better cover the storage space and counting trapped moths once
a week, we were able to indentify which 5 carriages harbored the
insects. We began a program of weekly vacuuming and watched the
population in the traps decrease over the summer. We froze three of the
smaller sleighs in a reefer truck over the winter. This spring,
pheromone baited traps and careful inspection of the vehicles showed
that the infestation was pretty well limited to the two larger sleighs
that had not been frozen, and it was significantly decreased from last
year. We continue to vacuum these two vehicles, have covered them with
plastic sheeting, and are working to move them to a separate storage
area. We continue to monitor the rest of the storage and are not seeing
a spread of the infestation to other artifacts. We did use some sticky
traps that were not baited quite close to the infested vehicles, and
they did not catch many moths at all. From this experience, I believe
that pheromone bait was critical in helping us manage this case making
moth infestation.
 
Rick    

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 4:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pestlist] bugs


Bill -

You make some good points; no one would want to put 40+ different kinds
of species specific pheromone traps in a museum collection storage area.
It is simply too expensive and we don't have traps available for every
kind of insect pest, which may invade collections.

The only ones currently available with a pheromone specific for the
kinds of pests we deal with, are those for certain fabric pests, i.e.
animal protein eating pests, such as webbing clothes moths and certain
carpet beetles.  There are also several available for the cigarette
beetle, which attacks herbarium collections, morturary masks, corn husk
dolls, papier mache puppets, etc.  I wish there were one available for
Anobium punctatum, an important pest in libraries and certain structural
wood situations, but there is none currently available.  In these kinds
of situations, pheromone monitoring can be very beneficial in locating
the source of infestations.  Once the source is known, other means can
be used for disinfestation, such as anoxic gases, freezing, vacuuming,
and bagging.

Tom Parker


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 4:01 pm
Subject: Re: [pestlist] bugs


Tom,
 
    Types of museum infestations can amount to many depending on the
collections mediums, national and international contact. Are you
suggesting 40+ or so different pheromone traps to be up to speed as they
are species specific, though not all developed yet. Or has The Museum
Trap been developed for all Art pest across the board? If you
considering placing specific species traps you probably already suspect
infestation and that is the time to trace the source. I don't need 10,
20 or 40 insects in a trap to know there is a problem. Monitoring the
Art and insect waste is much more effective than waiting for 1 to 4
times a year for pheromone traps to do there specific job. 
 
      Pheromone is great for agriculture and commercial applications
where standards need to be complied but for Art application I suggest
not. At best pheromone works 120 days a year during mating seasons.
Species specific make the process even more challenging, knowing when
mating takes place for 40 or so insects. Monitoring the Art is time
better spent than toying with specie specific traps. Yes, I am not up to
your speed by choice.
 
Bill
ACI
 
In a message dated 8/8/2008 8:00:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

        Bill -
        
        Perhaps you should contact Insects Limited in the Indianapolis,
the leader in pheromone research, production, and implementation in many
venues.   Perhaps you should get "up to speed" with your pheromone
information.  Pheromones are species specific.  A pheromone for one
species of moth will NOT attract other moths, as you have stated: "It
attracts many different moths, not just clothes, webbing or casemaking
moths."  The pheromone for webbing clothes moths does NOT attract
case-making clothes moths or any other species of moth for that matter.
        
        You are correct in stating pheromone traps should be used as a
monitoring approach, not a control approach.  This is why others have
indicated a variety of techniques should be used for control once an
infestation has been discovered.  Pheromone traps are very helpful in
determining the origin of an infestation so further investigation can
pinpoint the source of the infestation and then implement sanitation and
control measures.
        
        Tom Parker
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 4:45 pm
        Subject: [pestlist] bugs
        
        
        
        Thank you to all, pointing out my mistake; "pheromone is not
good for you". As I wrote below There are precautions however as stated
on the labels.
         
        Pheromone traps should never be used unless you intentionally
want to increase your insect population.
        Baited traps have the ability to pull from the outside. Should
you touch the traps pheromone is not good for you.
         
        Bill,
        ACI
         
            Pheromone was developed to monitor food warehouses in the
1950's for, India Meal moth, Mediterranean Flour moth, Raisin moth,
Tobacco moth, Angounois Grain moth. It was later found to work with
Clothes moth and Webbing moth as well as others. A good reason why I am
against there use related to Art. It attracts many different moths not
just clothes, webbing or casemaking moths.
            One person suggested the traps do not pull very far. I am
not sure how far and research has been difficult to find. But if
pheromone traps were to be placed by a door to a hallway leading to a
cafeteria, loading dock or other infested areas you can pull from
outside the storage area. 
            Pheromone works during matting maybe once a year to 4 times
a year depending how long the infestation has been indoors. It works on
the males flying around looking for females that are most likely
stationary, on a food source. One research reported traps collected
about 45% of the males in a controlled room. That still left plenty of
males to continue the cycle. Before the males reach the traps they may
have already visited the females. One study suggested there's
communication between the male and female during the mating cycle.
            Pheromone traps are just to monitor as plain sticky traps
are. I prefer plain as it give me a better feel in locating an
infestation. If a trap is pulling from other areas it adds confusion in
localizing the activity.
             Should you touch the pheromone sticky part of the trap you
can transfer pheromone to handled objects, if not washed off correctly.
            Pheromone traps are a monitoring device not a treatment.
         
                Once again I apologize for my mistake. I answered the
e-mail as I was leaving for my mapping, the beginning of my radiation
treatments. I wasn't really focused on what I had said.
        Bill
        ACI



        
________________________________

        Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos
<http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut0005000
0000017> .
        
________________________________

        It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and
gadgets that make the grade on AOL Shopping
<http://shopping.aol.com/back-to-school?ncid=aolins00050000000007> . 




________________________________

Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read
reviews on AOL Autos
<http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut0005000
0000017> .
________________________________

It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that
make the grade on AOL Shopping
<http://shopping.aol.com/back-to-school?ncid=aolins00050000000007> . 

Reply via email to