Hi Phil, On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 06:34:32PM +0100, Phil Thompson wrote: > Andy Smith wrote: > >So do you feel confident that you could convince a non-technical > >judge or jury that "http://example.com/contact"; is *not* an address > >for direct contact via electronic mail making it possible to contact > >example.com rapidly and communicating with them in a direct and > >effective manner? > > yes. Firstly I cannot put that into an email program and send a message > which suggests it is not an "electronic mail address" as per the wording > of the S.I.
Okay well we'll have to agree to disagree as I don't believe this or any of the other examples you give will do anything to convince a non-technical person that the above is not the case. Cheers, Andy -- http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Peterboro mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
