I pushed a simple update a couple days ago for this. Now for something harder, can we have a system for rating examples by their approachability and quality? Should we just do text on the first line (e.g. "Intermediate, recommended")? Or a more semantic system?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:32, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:24, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Jed, >> >> It is in the most obvious place. The rule html: in conf/rules >> Don't you do all your text processing in make? >> > > I prefer to use return-to-libc buffer overflow exploits in /bin/true. > > Unfortunately, they aren't very portable because some arcane systems have > a /bin/true that does nothing successfully without libc. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120311/bfb77bcc/attachment.html>
