On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I pushed a simple update a couple days ago for this. Now for something > harder, can we have a system for rating examples by their approachability > and quality? Should we just do text on the first line (e.g. "Intermediate, > recommended")? Or a more semantic system? > This is destined to be shit. If someone thinks an example is so good, they should write a paragraph describing it for the website. Matt > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:32, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:24, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> Jed, >>> >>> It is in the most obvious place. The rule html: in conf/rules >>> Don't you do all your text processing in make? >>> >> >> I prefer to use return-to-libc buffer overflow exploits in /bin/true. >> >> Unfortunately, they aren't very portable because some arcane systems have >> a /bin/true that does nothing successfully without libc. >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120311/2e225eb0/attachment.html>
