On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > > > > > Also since Mesh is a generic word but DMMesh is built on Sieve should > > DMMesh be renamed to DMSieve? > > > > I don't like that, because no one will understand what we are talking > > about. DMMesh makes sense. I might be > > alright with DMUnstructuredMesh, but that is overkill. > > > > Matt > > DMMesh is kind of like having a PCPRECONDITIONER > > I hear the criticism. I don't hear the alternative.
DMSIEVE, makes perfect sense, like PCSPAI Clearly we need documentation on DM and a flow chart as to possible choices for different types of problems to lead people to the right DM. Barry > What other word do people use for an unstructured mesh? > > Matt > > > Barry > > > > > > > Barry > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener
