On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> No, but perhaps I should. My understanding is that those lines only need
>> to be changed when ParMetis is included as a subproject, as they seem to
>> have configured the build system to use relative paths.
>>
>
> I would still have to be the one to apply the patch since PETSc is using a
> heavily patched version of ParMETIS. Mark, I'll try this out on Franklin
> later tonight or tomorrow.
>

Luckily CMake is much easier than BuildSystem. This should be a snap!

   Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111130/649692c1/attachment.html>

Reply via email to