On 14 September 2010 21:55, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > >> 1) If mpicc is in $PATH, then petscvariables will get PCC=mpicc. >> Perhaps it should get the full path instead? >> >> 2) I think CXX and FC variables should be renames to PCXX and PFC. The >> former names can easily conflict with CXX and FC defined in user >> makefiles for use with non-MPI sources. > > ? Then we should also get rid of CC > > ? ?Essentially you are saying we should remove all "traditional" use of these > variables from our makefiles? I agree doing that might be a good idea. But > doesn't it contradict your attempt to try hard to conform to standard usage > for things? >
Sorry, I need a clarification: Could you tell me why PETSc makefiles uses PCC instead of the "traditional" CC? Is it just because PCC could be CC or CXX depending on --with-c-language? -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
